On
the way back to Japan I watched something a bit more solemn – and the film I
wanted to watch last time I was on the way to Japan too. War flick Dunkirk, following some human stories of
the evacuation in 1940.
This isn’t a
particularly easy film to watch, nor a satisfying story, as it just follows
several characters during the chaos of a panicked evacuation. The only possible
triumph is escaping from a far stronger threat alive, though of course everyone
knows how the war ended five years later. The narrative essentially follows
various characters involved in the evacuation on sea, land and air, with the
emotional keypins being the piermaster commanding everything, a pleasure boat owner
doing his bit and his son having horrific formative experiences on the journey.
An RAF pilot is also heroic in the face of adversity, and there are a number of
scenes in sinking boats that are horrible reminders of the consequences of war,
but ultimately it’s more of a fragmented overview than a conventional story,
and probably stronger for it.
There are a number
of familiar faces and some less familiar ones. Kenneth Branagh is a strong
patriarchal figure, sometimes kindly, sometimes stoic and sometimes having to
be callous. Mark Rylance is probably the standout performer, with the perfect
everyman presence for this film. I struggled to remember where I recognised him
from – it was partly Bridge of Spies,
but mostly The BFG. Then I don’t know
whether I should be ashamed or proud to admit I didn’t recognise Harry Styles
one bit. He did a fine enough job, not standing out as a poor actor or making
me want to follow his acting career, but his character was perhaps the least compelling
of the film’s major cast.
Well-made, mature,
respectful historically and well-acted, this was an excellent addition to the
canon of war films. And like so many other war films, it is moving rather than
entertaining.
No comments:
Post a Comment