Looper asks a lot of its
audience. It asks them to accept its strong central premise – that in the
future, a machine is invented to send things back in time, but outlawed and
used only by criminals to send back men they want murdered, which becomes the
job of ‘loopers’ in a gritty near-future. It then asks them to believe that
someone in that future thinks it’s a good idea to make loopers execute
themselves to ‘close the loop’ rather than, y’know, sending them to one of
numerous other loopers to do the job as any sensible person would. It then
sneaks in the idea of telekinetic mutants, which is a good bit harder to
swallow, and by the end presents us with a very muddled sense of time travel,
where you have to accept elements of both linear and multi-world possibilities,
Back To The Future-style ways for actions in the present to affect a
person from the future, and a mind-boggling final scenario in which the only
way the mysterious Rainmaker comes into being is if main character Joe goes
back in time, but his going back in time sets into motion events that mean there
will be no Rainmaker. Part of this is the conception of a time-traveller faced
with contradictions from his past self having his memories gradually reshaped –
which means that at the end of the film, when Joe has the revelation he does, really
there should have been no need to do what he did, and everyone should have just
dropped their guns and maybe initiated the awesome adventure of going around in
a crime-fighting gang making sure the kid was brought up right. That would definitely
have made for a better film that what we got, which was largely two people with
a fascinating relationship staying very far away from one another.
Looper isn’t really for picking apart the intricacies of the timelines,
though. It’s mostly for enjoying as an action flick, and in that, it mostly
works – other than one very far-fetched scene where Bruce Willis takes out an
entire crime syndicate by shooting through a doorway at something offscreen –
amongst the worst such action shots I’ve ever seen. Joseph Gordon-Levitt is
likeable even though his character is so unappealing, which makes the film work,
and it’s astonishing that it becomes believable that little Tommy Solomon could
grow up to be Bruce Willis. Some moments have Levitt look very odd, like his
eyebrows have been badly darkened, but others – especially when he is being
interrogated by his boss, or face-to-face with him in the diner – have him look
uncannily like Willis. The former may be all angles, hair and the way he holds
his face, but the latter looks like some digital manipulation of noses and
chins has gone on. Either way, it works far better than I expected.
On a final tangential note, the D-Box moving chairs are
hilarious to sit behind. The little synchronised wobbles were funny, but when a
series of explosions happened, the chairs did a brilliantly funny synchronised
dance together. Distracting but fun!
No comments:
Post a Comment